This article is a practical summary of the top five areas, common to all major security standards and frameworks, which crypto exchange companies need to engage with, in order to protect their platform.
- Understand Risks and Threats
- Business Process Controls
- Policies and Procedures
- Vendors and Third Parties
- Security Vulnerabilities and Operational Capabilities (Pen Test!)
According to a 2019 Kaspersky study of cryptocurrency holders, 19% of the global population has owned a cryptocurrency. If this number is accurate, that means 1.46 billion people have found out how to mine, buy, or exchange in order to access this new market. What this number says to me is that a lot of average citizens have started to participate in this ecosystem meaning the market must mature not only in terms of ease of use but in meeting the expectations of users.
In 2020, crypto exchanges must put security, protection of users, and protection of funds at the forefront of their systems. There’s no other way that we can even hope to onboard the other 81% of the world unless the security, technical capabilities, and operational capabilities of exchanges can meet the expectations of the user base. The user base, the less sophisticated it gets, will rely on crypto exchanges as their single point of failure for their wealth, their savings, their tokens. Unsophisticated users cannot be trusted to maintain their own cold wallet or hot wallet. In reality, most people can’t even keep their mobile phone working; how can we trust them to manage complicated software or hardware to keep their own money safe? How can we allow their hard-earned wealth to be lost due to an attack which moves their tokens outside of our/their control?
Globally, stock markets and stock brokerages are some of the most highly secured and highly regulated entities because they must be in order to protect the funds of the people who rely on them. They don’t do this because they want to; they do it because there are billions/trillions of dollars at risk. I believe that to most average crypto holders, an exchange is directly equivalent to their stock exchange, or their stockbroker – tokens have real value to them. They have the same expectations of Crypto.com, Binance, Circle, Coinbase as they do of Goldman Sachs, Daiwa Securities, TD Waterhouse, Charles Schwab, Ameritrade, or any other global brokerage.
If users of the technology have expectations of how their money is to be protected, it’s time that all cryptocurrencies and crypto exchanges put in place the capabilities to deliver operational protections, insurance, and security controls.
This article is far too short to cover the vast amount of requirements that you could translate from standards from PCI, NIST, ISO, FDIC, FFIEC, FINRA, ASD, FCA or IOSCO, so I’d like to talk about five key areas that are most common to all of them and should be among the first things that you do to protect your crypto exchange platform.
The role of a CISO or head of security demands a full awareness of evolving threats and the ability to keep the organization ahead of the curve, balancing program agility with long-term information security strategies, while ensuring compliance with regulatory demands, especially in this world where the regulatory demands change by country or even by token type. Increased attention from users or investors means CISOs must also be able to demonstrate the organization’s maturity level around information security and risk posture at any time, providing data that shows the true security capabilities present.
One of the first steps in the process is to understand true risks and threats. Without exploring the legal risks, or compliance threats for being unlicensed or similar violations, let’s focus instead on cybersecurity, infrastructure, and operational risks.
Generally, the gold standard for understanding this area is to conduct a risk assessment and conduct a tabletop exercise. A tabletop exercise is one in which you pick a scenario and then discuss with your team how you would discover and then react to such a scenario.
Understanding your gaps can help you build out your technical and process capabilities. There are a few good resources to help get your mind thinking.
In addition to the above examples, it is often necessary to hire an external consultant to conduct your tabletop exercise, primarily due to the time or lack of skill from within the organization.
Kudelski Security has run a number of tabletop exercises on crypto exchanges, private banks, stock markets, and entire institutions. Our experience in this area may allow you to quickly uncover some major areas in which you might have missed yourself.
Many of the more complicated attacks start with common threats such as phishing, collusion, and other attacks focused on human or human processes. Generally speaking, there should be no human single points of failure within your business processes, but unless you document and test each of them, you may never know where your failure points are.
In 2019, attacks across all organizations have increased with the highest number being human, errors, phishing attacks, and password reuse.
Walkthroughs or using external Advisory Services should determine if you need to improve your internal process controls, bring in technology consulting, use an external managed service, or build custom continuous auditing solutions. It’s important to have a blueprint that you can follow to determine the focus or order of your investments. Without a business-aligned program, you may not be able to meet all evolving needs. Focusing review on only online attacks is probably missing your #1 attack vector: your own employees.
We know you had to get to market quickly to meet demand from your investors, customers, or to get to market first. This likely resulted in code reuse, open source selection, and is not really taking the time to write down any or all of your policies and procedures upon which you can measure your business and technical capabilities.
This is probably the thing that technologists hate the most, taking the time to document what they have done. Some like to build repeatable processes, but most hate to write it down. I’m just going to say that you have to, but you should probably just hire an external documentation writer, or bring in an outside consultant that can walk through your process with you and take the time to document it for you – working with your internal team. Face it, you’ll probably not do it yourself.
Remember how I said above that most regulations have a requirement to document your policies and procedures. No matter where you are in the world, or which jurisdiction you will be regulated by – I guarantee that you will have a requirement to write down and then test your policies and procedures.
As you think about what you need, likely based on principals from ISO 27002, you’ll ultimately design and develop a cybersecurity program, hopefully with support from our experienced advisors that have both a strategic and tactical elements. Getting help to architect your security infrastructure, architect your policies, establish a risk management program, develop effective reporting and implement your information security management system is all part of doing this right.
We are only as strong as our weakest link, right? When we hire suppliers, connect to external systems, or bring data in/out of our network we open things up to risks that are present in those environments also.
Generally, an assessment must be done on your third parties, especially if you transmit or receive private or customer information with them.This is often started by exchanging questionnaires with your third parties and hoping that they provide accurate answers.It’s especially tough if you are the smaller entity in the agreement.
There are some general guidelines that you can follow when building out a third-party risk program, especially in the crypto space where most vendors have immature processes.
Within something like a crypto exchange, it is almost never the blockchain that gets compromised. In fact, it is very unlikely that cryptography is what will be compromised. What is likely is that your web site could have a failure, there are logic problems in the forms, user errors in logging in or out, problems with cookies, cross-site-scripting, or operational flow misses which allow attackers to compromise the exchange. Testing your smart contract will not uncover any of these flaws, which is why it is important to review the more traditional things that you can do to analyze your full system surface area of attack.
In 2019 there have been seven major attacks (and lots of small ones) that have resulted in 4.4 billion in losses. That’s not a small amount, and you absolutely need to do whatever you can to ensure that you don’t add to this statistic.
It is absolutely not enough anymore to simply run an open source script against your code or review your smart contract. What you need to realize is that your entire environment is in-scope when it comes to risk and attacks – especially the technical bits that connect to the internet which are directly accessible by robotic botnet attacks and well-funded threat actors. It is important to do full penetration tests from the external and internal perspective, it is important to scan and repair vulnerabilities, and it is important to monitor for operational and security alerts, which may be attacks.
Unless you have spent significantly on security staff who have traditional cybersecurity expertise, including systems security, pentesting, and software development, you should probably bring in a third-party which can build-out and execute against your testing and operational needs.
From Kudelski Security’s viewpoint, testing a crypto exchange is very similar to testing money-flow with heightened secrecy for a private bank. The main categories that we can focus when we do a crypto exchange test include the following areas:
· User-validation, private documents, user-forms, KYC
· Data testing, including inflow/outflow of any information taken or presented to the user
· Money-glow, purchase, sale, crypto-trade
· Authentication, authorization, enrollment, deletion
· Software security testing, API testing
· Architectural review
When you determine the type of vendor to work with on this sort of assessment, you want to bring in experts in all areas of this, not just someone who is good at cryptocurrency. The vast majority of the vulnerabilities have nothing to do with cryptocurrency. Pen testers with years of experience using human validation in addition to automated tools, hardware assessment where there are cold wallets, and additional skills are all things you should look for in your chosen company.
If you are a believer in the future of cryptocurrency, digital tokens, digital twins, security tokens and the new business models in which these enable then you need a secure environment in which to buy, sell, trade and hold on to these tokens. Why wouldn’t you require a level of security of this environment equivalent to that of a first-world banking environment? You should work with a security company to help that has experience in this environment; your customers trust you to do the right thing.
Latest posts by Scott J. Carlson (see all)
- Crypto Exchange Security - December 5, 2019
- Blockchain Does Not Remove Cybersecurity Risks - May 14, 2019
- Welcome to the Year of Trust Delivery with the Enterprise DLT - January 8, 2019